
Change in distance traveled each day
Traveled less than normal
Traveled more than normal

Change in distance traveled each day
Traveled less than normal
Traveled more than normal

Change in distance traveled each day
Traveled less than normal
Traveled more than normal

Change in distance traveled each day
Traveled less than normal
Traveled more than normal

Change in distance traveled each day
Traveled less
Traveled more
Note: Uses a three-day moving average.
The coronavirus pandemic has ground America to a halt from coast to coast. But not all states have reacted the same way or to the same degree, despite warnings from health experts that drastic measures are needed to slow the spread.
The impact of social distancing and work-from-home measures has been captured using data on smartphone movements, an analysis of which was provided to the Times Opinion section by Descartes Labs, a geospatial analysis company.
The data shows how states hit hard by the virus, like New York, California and Washington, have seen travel plummet. But other states with fewer confirmed infections have seen smaller declines, presenting challenges for controlling the spread of the virus.
Travel declined in all states as the number of confirmed cases grew
People tend to isolate and practice social distancing when they feel an imminent threat. But health experts argue that states without many confirmed infections should react as though the virus is already widespread — because it probably is.
“The cases we see today reflect transmission that has happened in the past,” said Ashleigh Tuite, an epidemiologist at the University of Toronto. “We have to be able to anticipate what is to come.”
To measure how social distancing has changed our behavior, analysts looked at how far people travel each day using smartphone G.P.S. signals, calculating an average distance for each county and state. On a normal day, people might commute for an hour to work or drive across town to drop their kids off at school. But after many lawmakers encouraged residents to stay put, closing workplaces and most schools in the process, the data shows travel swiftly declining in many counties.
Data collected from smartphones can be imprecise and noisy, especially in smaller counties where fewer users share their location. Even still, the analysis offers one of few ways to measure how the country is reacting to the crisis in near-real-time.
The South and Midwest lag behind

Change in distance traveled March 18-20
-60% or less
+30% or more

Change in distance traveled March 18-20
-60% or less
+30% or more
Note: Uses a three-day average.
The smartphone movements capture one major turning point: the weekend of March 14 and 15, by which point many states, including New York, Massachusetts and Illinois, had ordered restaurants and schools to close. By March 16, as the number of confirmed cases surpassed 4,500 nationwide, many parts of the country finally saw significant declines in daily travel.
Areas in the South and Midwest have seen fewer coronavirus cases so far and haven’t slowed down as much. Places like Texas, Florida and Louisiana saw drops around 40 percent at the beginning of last week, but those numbers have leveled off even as the number of confirmed cases continues to climb. (The total number of infections is likely much higher than what’s been confirmed due to a lack of testing.)

Change in distance traveled, March 18-20
-60% or less
+30% or more
Seattle’s King County
saw declines of 71%
New York was hit hardest
by the virus so far and
has seen some of the
largest declines
California’s shelter-
in-place ordinance
saw movements fall
65% lower than normal
Some of the smallest declines
are found in northern Florida,
Georgia and Alabama, where
the number of infections are
beginning to climb

Change in distance traveled, March 18-20
-60% or less
+30% or more
Seattle’s King
County saw
declines of 71%
New York was hit hardest
by the virus so far and
has seen some of the
largest declines
California’s shelter-
in-place ordinance
saw movements fall
by 65% across the state
Some of the smallest
declines are in northern
Florida, Georgia and Alabama,
where the number of infections
are beginning to climb

Change in distance traveled, March 18-20
-60% or less
+30% or more

Change in distance traveled, March 18-20
-60%
or less
+30%
or more
Note: Uses a three-day average.
It’s also unclear what role statements from some Republican lawmakers and conservative media outlets played in influencing the reaction in right-leaning states. Early on, some conservatives colored the pandemic as an overblown “media-fueled hysteria,” encouraging constituents to continue eating at restaurants despite the warnings. President Trump also downplayed the risks at first, labeling concern over the virus a mere “hoax.”
Polling suggests Republicans have been less concerned about coronavirus overall. But those numbers are starting to change as infections spread and the markets continue to tumble.
The lesson here is that they must act now, before they start looking like New York or Washington.
“People sometimes think that you’re overreacting,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in an interview with CNN. “I like it when people are thinking I’m overreacting because that means we’re doing it just right.”
See how your state and county have slowed by selecting your state from the dropdown menu below.

Change in distance traveled
-60% or less
+30% or more
"how" - Google News
March 23, 2020 at 04:00PM
https://ift.tt/2xZyjC5
Opinion | How Has Your State Reacted to Social Distancing? - The New York Times
"how" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MfXd3I
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Opinion | How Has Your State Reacted to Social Distancing? - The New York Times"
Post a Comment